review-thinking

To audit travel planning thinking quality, evaluate the thinking_result for demand identification, information-gap analysis, and route justification. This ensures the coordinator's planning process comprehensively captures requirements and transparently explains decisions.

Lazy inference in travel planning occurs when a coordinator skips information-gap analysis or fails to justify tool usage and route decisions. Auditing the planning_process flags these gaps, enforcing structured checks for accountability and transparent reasoning.

Validating tool usage rationale requires checking the thinking_result to verify why specific tools or agents are invoked. The audit enforces structured checks to ensure every tool usage has a clear justification and documents decision trade-offs.

Yes, the audit process checks requirement coverage by ensuring key fields like destination, days, transport preferences, group size, and budget are identified. It validates that the thinking_result comprehensively captures these user requirements.

A key limitation is that any exposure of hidden chain-of-thought in the planning_process is flagged as a risk. The audit enforces structured reasoning but cannot fix underlying gaps in demand identification or route justification automatically.