review-trivial

Name: review-trivial
Availability: InStock
Author: kamp-us

Verify trivial pull requests against a scoped acceptance checklist.

25|5|Updated May 9, 2026

Search Tags:#code review #pull request #software quality #review process #PR verification

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/kamp-us/phoenix --skill review-trivial

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-trivial
Source: https://github.com/kamp-us/phoenix/tree/main/claude-plugins/kampus-pipeline/skills/review-trivial
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kamp-us/phoenix --skill review-trivial

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the review process for trivial pull requests, providing a faster, lightweight verification gate to ensure code quality and compliance with acceptance criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

Lightweight Review: Offers a simplified review process for small, single-concern PRs.
Fail-Closed: Ensures that any ambiguity, surprise, or out-of-scope changes result in a fail, preventing merges with potential issues.
Independent Review: Operates with a separate reviewer to maintain objectivity and prevent author bias.

Quick Start

Run the review-trivial skill on PR #123 to verify the changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-trivial

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I verify trivial pull requests without a full code review?▼

A fail-closed trivial PR review blocks merges when ambiguity, surprise, or out-of-scope changes are detected. This lightweight verification gate prevents merging pull requests with potential issues by strictly failing any unexpected modifications.

When should I use a lightweight verification gate for pull requests?▼

An independent reviewer is needed for trivial PR verification to maintain objectivity and prevent author bias. Operating with a separate reviewer ensures the SHA-bound verdicts remain impartial during the lightweight code review process.

What happens if a trivial PR contains out-of-scope changes during review?▼

If a trivial PR contains out-of-scope changes, the fail-closed review process will result in a fail. This mechanism prevents merges with potential issues by strictly blocking any ambiguous or surprising modifications found during PR verification.

How do I ensure code quality for single-concern pull requests efficiently?▼

You can ensure code quality for single-concern pull requests by running a streamlined review process that applies a scoped checklist. This method efficiently verifies that small changes meet acceptance criteria without requiring a full, complex control plane review.