review

Review code for type-safety, error handling, security, and performance issues.

1|Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tubone24/claude-code-settings --skill review-tubone24
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/tubone24/claude-code-settings/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tubone24/claude-code-settings --skill review-tubone24

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

指定されたコードやファイルの品質を体系的に評価・改善するためのガイドと基準を提供します。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 型安全性の検証と改善案の提示
  • エラーハンドリングと境界ケースの検討
  • セキュリティとパフォーマンスの評価
  • 使用例: 新規機能のコードをレビューして潜在的な脆弱性を指摘し、リファクタリング提案を行う

Quick Start

指定されたコードを読み込み、型安全性・エラーハンドリング・セキュリティ・パフォーマンスを総合的に評価して具体的な改善点を提案してください。

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a comprehensive code review to identify security and performance issues?

A comprehensive code review systematically evaluates type-safety, error handling, edge cases, security, and performance across software projects, outputting actionable improvement results in a structured Markdown checklist.

Can I use this code review process for JavaScript and TypeScript projects?

Yes, this code review process applies to software projects across languages, specifically focusing on JavaScript and TypeScript environments to verify type safety, evaluate performance, and identify potential vulnerabilities.

What is the best way to review pull requests for type safety and edge cases?

The best way to review pull requests for type safety and edge cases is to apply a systematic code review workflow that verifies type integrity, evaluates error handling, and outputs structured Markdown checklists with actionable refactoring suggestions.

How do I audit existing code for security vulnerabilities and error handling?

To audit existing code, run a comprehensive code review focusing on security vulnerabilities and error handling, which evaluates boundary cases and outputs a structured checklist of specific security and quality improvements.

Does the code review output provide actionable refactoring suggestions?

Yes, the code review output provides actionable refactoring suggestions by delivering results in a structured Markdown checklist that highlights type safety improvements, error handling fixes, and performance optimizations to address identified quality issues.