skills.rest
tvishwanadha
tvishwanadhaCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review

Run Codex in read-only mode to review plans and code changes.

Updated Feb 15, 2026
Search Tags:#codex#quality-assurance#code-review#discussion#plan-review#review-process#defect-detection
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tvishwanadha/skills --skill review-tvishwanadha
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/tvishwanadha/skills/tree/main/plugins/codex/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tvishwanadha/skills --skill review-tvishwanadha

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Get a Codex-based critical second opinion on plans, implementations, or code changes before you commit to them.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Surface defects, gaps, and risks in plans, implementations, or changes using a read-only Codex review.
  • Support two review modes: New / restart for fresh threads and Continue for revisiting findings, with actionable, cited feedback.
  • Provide concrete findings with traceable evidence and guidance on fixes to improve quality and avoid regressions.

Quick Start

Paste your plan, implementation, or code changes in a fresh thread and initiate Codex review in read-only mode.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get an automated code review before committing changes?▼

You can get a second opinion on code changes by pasting your implementation into a fresh thread and triggering a read-only Codex review. It analyzes the changes and outputs concrete findings with traceable evidence and actionable fix guidance.

What is a Codex-based plan review and how does it work?▼

A Codex-based plan review is a read-only critical evaluation of your proposed development plans before commitment. It works by analyzing the plan content in a fresh thread to identify defects, gaps, and risks, providing cited feedback to improve quality and avoid regressions.

Can I use this review process to validate completion of an implementation?▼

Yes, you can validate completion before finalizing work by initiating a Codex review on your implementation. It evaluates the changes to files and provides a critical second opinion to ensure quality requirements are met without introducing regressions.

How do I continue reviewing findings after an initial code review?▼

To continue reviewing findings after an initial session, use the Continue review mode designed for revisiting existing results. This mode allows you to pick up where the previous read-only Codex analysis left off and work through the actionable, cited feedback.

Does the Codex review process modify my code during defect detection?▼

No, the Codex review process runs strictly in read-only mode and does not modify your code. It solely analyzes plans, implementations, or code changes to output concrete findings with traceable evidence and guidance on how to fix identified defects.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
LucaDeLeoLucaDeLeo
1

gsd:second-opinion

Run OpenAI Codex to provide a read-only second opinion on code or architecture.

Community
Intermediate
ShiienShiien
7

code-commit

Stage files, run tests, and commit with a standardized prefix and diff summary.

Community
Advanced
RoyMcCrainRoyMcCrain
1

codex

Run Codex CLI and Claude's code-reviewer subagent for parallel code review.

Community
Intermediate
icartshicartsh
4

code-analyze

Analyze .NET solutions for code quality, security, and dependency issues.

Community
Advanced