review

Performs role-based critiques and merges results via a consensus gate.

37|7|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/unclejobs-ai/second-claude-code --skill review-unclejobs-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/unclejobs-ai/second-claude-code/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/unclejobs-ai/second-claude-code --skill review-unclejobs-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It prevents silent failures by running structured, parallel critiques so content, strategy, or code is thoroughly validated instead of rubber-stamped.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel specialized reviewers: logic, devil’s-advocate weak points, fact-checked claims, tone fit, and structure/readability—then merged via a consensus gate.
  • Preset-based coverage: choose content/strategy/code/security/academic/quick/full depending on risk and artifact type.
  • Actionable, location-specific findings: every issue must include precise location and a concrete fix suggestion (no vague feedback).
  • Optional external verification & security integration: --external can add an extra voter; the security preset can invoke mmbridge security.

Quick Start

Use the review skill to review a draft by running: give me a review of this document using the full preset.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a parallel code review and fact checking process before publishing?

Parallel code review and fact checking is executed by dispatching specialized role-based critics that validate logic, claims, and tone, merging results through a strict consensus gate to ensure reliability.

What is consensus gating in quality assurance and how does it improve output reliability?

Consensus gating in quality assurance merges structured parallel critiques from multiple reviewers, requiring agreement before approval to prevent silent failures and ensure knowledge-work outputs are thoroughly validated.

How to perform an academic critique with citation and methodology scrutiny?

Perform an academic critique using the academic preset, which dispatches reviewers to scrutinize citations and methodology, generating actionable findings with precise locations and concrete fix suggestions.

Can I use a security audit preset to invoke external verification for my strategy validation?

Yes, the security preset can invoke external verification for strategy validation by adding an extra voter through the external flag, ensuring comprehensive risk assessment and security audit coverage.

Does code review provide actionable, location-specific findings for weak points?

Code review provides actionable, location-specific findings by requiring every issue to include a precise location and a concrete fix suggestion, ensuring clear feedback rather than vague observations.

What are the limitations of preset-based coverage for pre-publish checks?

Preset-based coverage for pre-publish checks is limited by its selected scope; choosing quick, content, strategy, code, security, or academic presets restricts the dispatched reviewers to the specific risk profile of that preset.