review

To get a reviewer-style critique, provide your Overleaf project name. The tool ingests the LaTeX source, runs mechanical preflight checks like compilation and citation hygiene, and generates an actionable diagnostic markdown report.

Yes, you can run an automated self-review on your AI/ML paper. It performs a multi-phase review that interrogates sections with specificity and produces a venue-style critique for drafts targeted at NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, COLM, and ARR.

During self-review, the tool runs mechanical validation checks including compiling with latexmk, scanning build logs, checking page limits, grepping for placeholder red flags, and verifying citation hygiene before generating the final report.

No, the automated paper critique does not modify your original LaTeX source files. It reads the project directory, parses the main .tex file with recursive includes, and writes the classified issues report to a separate underscore-prefixed _reviews/ directory.

To prepare for LaTeX ingestion, place your Overleaf project folder under the path ~/Documents/docs/project/<name>/. The tool resolves the project by this name, recursively ingests the sources, and extracts structured elements like figures, tables, and equations.

The best way to check figures, tables, and equations is using the structured preflight pipeline. It ingests your LaTeX project, pulls structured elements, and runs a citation-aware diagnostic to identify presentation problems and clarity gaps without altering the draft.