review-work

Coordinates multiple specialist subagents to identify risks and improvements in git changes.

11|1|Updated Jan 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/agoodway/.claude --skill review-work-agoodway
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-work
Source: https://github.com/agoodway/.claude/tree/main/skills/review-work
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/agoodway/.claude --skill review-work-agoodway

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill coordinates multiple specialist subagents to perform a thorough, parallel analysis of code and project changes, reducing review time and increasing coverage.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel Specialist Analysis: Assigns 4-6 domain experts (e.g., Code Quality, Security, Performance, Tests) to analyze changes in parallel.
  • Cross-Pollination Round: Aggregates findings across domains to identify intersections and systemic issues.
  • Codex Meta-Analysis: Performs a fresh perspective synthesis on all findings to surface unseen risks.
  • Actionable Output: Produces prioritized recommendations with file:line references and an output protocol for integration.
  • Usage Scenario: Use when complex changes require multi-domain validation and a rigorous review process.

Quick Start

Use the /review-work-agent [optional file/area to focus on] to begin the multi-agent review of the current changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-work

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-agent code review for mixed git changes?

Automate multi-agent code review by orchestrating specialist subagents to analyze git changes in parallel. This coordinates domain experts across code, documentation, and tests to identify risks and improvements with cross-validation.

What is the best way to perform risk analysis on complex code changes?

Risk analysis on complex code changes is best performed by deploying multiple specialist subagents for parallel evaluation. A cross-pollination round aggregates findings to identify systemic issues, followed by a meta-analysis to surface unseen risks.

How does parallel specialist analysis work for code and project changes?

Parallel specialist analysis works by assigning four to six domain experts, such as Code Quality, Security, and Performance, to evaluate changes simultaneously. This reduces review time and increases coverage by cross-validating findings across domains.

Can I use multi-agent orchestration to review both code and documentation updates?

Yes, you can use multi-agent orchestration to review mixed-code changes across code, documentation, and tests. The orchestration assigns relevant specialists to each area, enabling comprehensive parallel analysis and integrated synthesis.

How do I get actionable output with file references from an automated code review?

Get actionable output by running a final synthesis of the multi-agent review, which produces prioritized recommendations with file and line references. This synthesis integrates findings from all specialist subagents into a clear output protocol.

When do I need multi-agent orchestration instead of a standard code review?

You need multi-agent orchestration when complex changes require multi-domain validation and a rigorous review process. It is ideal for reducing review time on large mixed-code changes by leveraging parallel analysis and cross-pollination.