review-work

Coordinate a five-agent post-implementation review to validate code changes against goals and constraints.

2|Updated Apr 30, 2026

Search Tags:#git #security #qa #review #code-quality #context-mining

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/BOHUYESHAN-APB/openagent-labforge-bio --skill review-work-bohuyeshan-apb

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-work
Source: https://github.com/BOHUYESHAN-APB/openagent-labforge-bio/tree/main/src/skills/review-work
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BOHUYESHAN-APB/openagent-labforge-bio --skill review-work-bohuyeshan-apb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinate a multi-agent post-implementation review to validate that changes meet goals and constraints.

Core Features & Use Cases

5-agent parallel review: Goal Verifier, QA Executor, Code Reviewer, Security Auditor, Context Miner collaborate to assess correctness, reliability, security, and missed context across code changes.
Phase-based inputs: Collects GOAL, CONSTRAINTS, BACKGROUND, CHANGED_FILES, DIFF, and FILE_CONTENTS to inform the review.
Actionable verdicts: Returns PASS/FAIL with blocking issues and a structured final report, guiding remediation.

Quick Start

Say the prompt "review my changes" to initiate a five-agent post-implementation review.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-work

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate a post-implementation code review for security and correctness?▼

Initiate a multi-agent post-implementation review by providing your goals, constraints, diffs, and changed file contents. The five-agent process evaluates correctness, reliability, security, and missed context to return a structured PASS or FAIL verdict with blocking issues.

What is a multi-agent code review process and how does it work?▼

A multi-agent code review deploys specialized agents including a Goal Verifier, QA Executor, Code Reviewer, Security Auditor, and Context Miner. These agents collaborate on your diff and file contents to assess correctness, reliability, security, and missed context simultaneously.

Can I run a security audit and QA execution together on my git diff?▼

Yes, you can run a security audit and QA execution together on a git diff by applying a coordinated five-agent review process. The Security Auditor and QA Executor agents evaluate your changed files concurrently to identify blocking issues and reliability gaps.

What inputs do I need to provide for an automated code quality and context mining review?▼

You need to provide phase-based inputs including your GOAL, CONSTRAINTS, BACKGROUND, CHANGED_FILES, DIFF, and FILE_CONTENTS. Supplying these inputs informs the five-agent review process to accurately assess code quality, security, and missed context.

Does an automated code review workflow return actionable remediation steps for failed changes?▼

Yes, the automated review workflow returns actionable remediation steps for failed changes. It produces a structured final report with a PASS or FAIL verdict, highlighting blocking issues found by the QA Executor and Security Auditor to guide your fixes.