skills.rest
BOHUYESHAN-APB
BOHUYESHAN-APBCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review-work

Coordinate a five-agent post-implementation review to validate code changes against goals and constraints.

2|Updated Apr 30, 2026
Search Tags:#git#security#qa#review#code-quality#context-mining
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BOHUYESHAN-APB/openagent-labforge-bio --skill review-work-bohuyeshan-apb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-work
Source: https://github.com/BOHUYESHAN-APB/openagent-labforge-bio/tree/main/src/skills/review-work
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BOHUYESHAN-APB/openagent-labforge-bio --skill review-work-bohuyeshan-apb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinate a multi-agent post-implementation review to validate that changes meet goals and constraints.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 5-agent parallel review: Goal Verifier, QA Executor, Code Reviewer, Security Auditor, Context Miner collaborate to assess correctness, reliability, security, and missed context across code changes.
  • Phase-based inputs: Collects GOAL, CONSTRAINTS, BACKGROUND, CHANGED_FILES, DIFF, and FILE_CONTENTS to inform the review.
  • Actionable verdicts: Returns PASS/FAIL with blocking issues and a structured final report, guiding remediation.

Quick Start

Say the prompt "review my changes" to initiate a five-agent post-implementation review.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-work

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a post-implementation code review for security and correctness?▼

Initiate a multi-agent post-implementation review by providing your goals, constraints, diffs, and changed file contents. The five-agent process evaluates correctness, reliability, security, and missed context to return a structured PASS or FAIL verdict with blocking issues.

What is a multi-agent code review process and how does it work?▼

A multi-agent code review deploys specialized agents including a Goal Verifier, QA Executor, Code Reviewer, Security Auditor, and Context Miner. These agents collaborate on your diff and file contents to assess correctness, reliability, security, and missed context simultaneously.

Can I run a security audit and QA execution together on my git diff?▼

Yes, you can run a security audit and QA execution together on a git diff by applying a coordinated five-agent review process. The Security Auditor and QA Executor agents evaluate your changed files concurrently to identify blocking issues and reliability gaps.

What inputs do I need to provide for an automated code quality and context mining review?▼

You need to provide phase-based inputs including your GOAL, CONSTRAINTS, BACKGROUND, CHANGED_FILES, DIFF, and FILE_CONTENTS. Supplying these inputs informs the five-agent review process to accurately assess code quality, security, and missed context.

Does an automated code review workflow return actionable remediation steps for failed changes?▼

Yes, the automated review workflow returns actionable remediation steps for failed changes. It produces a structured final report with a PASS or FAIL verdict, highlighting blocking issues found by the QA Executor and Security Auditor to guide your fixes.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
reedomreedom

collect-commits-and-files

Collect and categorize changed files from Git for review workflows.

Community
Advanced
arpitnatharpitnath
86

code-review

Automate pre-commit code reviews with structured feedback and blocking commits.

Community
Advanced
KrismithReddy12KrismithReddy12

health

Calculate a weighted 0-10 code quality score from linters and test runners.

Community
Advanced
erichugyerichugy

address-pr-comments

Fetch unresolved GitHub review threads and implement fixes via multi-agent worktrees.

Community
Advanced