review-work

Orchestrate post-implementation reviews with pass-fail aggregation and bounded retries.

5|Updated May 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/islee23520/lfg --skill review-work-islee23520
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-work
Source: https://github.com/islee23520/lfg/tree/main/skills/review-work
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/islee23520/lfg --skill review-work-islee23520

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill orchestrates a thorough post-implementation review for completed work, so you can confirm that a change actually meets the request before it is approved.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Goal Verification: Checks whether the implementation matches the original objective and respects the stated constraints.
  • Hands-On QA: Drives execution-based testing to verify the change works in practice, not just on paper.
  • Code Quality and Security Review: Evaluates maintainability, correctness, and security risks across the changed files.
  • Context Mining: Searches surrounding history and related context to uncover missed requirements or important background.
  • Use Case: After a feature, fix, or refactor is completed, this Skill helps determine whether the work is truly ready to merge.

Quick Start

Use this skill to review the latest implementation work and report whether it passes goal, QA, quality, security, and context checks.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-work

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify completed code changes against original goals and constraints?

To verify code changes against goals, you run a post-implementation review that checks whether the implementation matches the original objective and respects stated constraints before approving the merge.

How does hands-on QA testing work for post-implementation code review?

Hands-on QA for code review drives execution-based testing to verify that completed changes work in practice. It uses parallel sub-agent orchestration with bounded retries when a testing lane is inconclusive.

What's the best way to run a security review and code quality inspection on completed work?

Run a security and code quality review by orchestrating parallel sub-agents to evaluate maintainability, correctness, and security risks across changed files, aggregating explicit pass-fail results to determine merge readiness.

Can I use context mining to find missed requirements during a code review?

Yes, context mining during a code review searches surrounding history and related context to uncover missed requirements or important background, ensuring the implementation captures all necessary project details before merging.

What happens when a code review sub-agent returns inconclusive results?

When a code review sub-agent returns inconclusive results, the orchestration applies bounded retries for that lane. This ensures explicit pass-fail aggregation across goal verification, QA, quality, security, and context checks.