review-wow

To audit agentic workflows for gaps, this skill analyzes your Ways of Working against best-practices across frontier models and industry reports. It performs parallel subagent reviews across your CLAUDE.md, agents, rules, and skills to surface inconsistencies and map them to actionable improvements.

Agentic workflow gap analysis is a process that identifies missing best-practices and cross-document inconsistencies in your AI methodologies. This skill validates consistency by deploying parallel subagent reviews across your configuration files and synthesizing the results into prioritized recommendations.

Yes, you can review both code and content projects. The scope includes gap analysis and best-practices synthesis for non-code workflows and code generation alike, mapping identified issues to actionable improvements for your parallel subagent agentic operations.

You get actionable recommendations by running this skill to synthesize the findings from its parallel subagent reviews. It produces a consolidated plan with traceable sources, clear prioritization, and concrete next steps to elevate your agentic Ways of Working.

Yes, this skill works directly with CLAUDE.md files, agents, rules, and skills. It deploys parallel subagent reviews to surface cross-document gaps and validate consistency across these specific configuration files to ensure alignment with frontier-model best practices.

You should run an agentic workflow consistency review when you need to ensure your methodologies stay current with industry best practices. Governance teams often run this skill monthly to identify gaps, validate alignment, and update their Ways of Working proactively.