review-writing

Convert structured research synthesis into continuous Chinese literature review paragraphs.

2|Updated Aug 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DeepJH/doubao-skill-and-info --skill review-writing-deepjh
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-writing
Source: https://github.com/DeepJH/doubao-skill-and-info/tree/main/skills/doubao-academic-researcher/sub-skills/review-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DeepJH/doubao-skill-and-info --skill review-writing-deepjh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Turning a structured literature analysis into polished, publication-style review prose is error-prone: writers often add unsupported claims, leave scaffolding behind, or drift into writing a full paper. This Skill rewrites an existing research synthesis into 3-6 continuous natural paragraphs of Chinese academic literature review text without adding new judgments, citations, or facts. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Gated Drafting Pipeline: Enforces input gates (SYNTHESIS_HANDOFF, claim/citation/tension/gap pools) and blocks drafting when upstream material is incomplete. - Boundary-Safe Composition: Generates only review body paragraphs in Chinese core-journal or thesis style, with author-year citations drawn strictly from the upstream citation pool. - Automated Draft Validation: Runs check_review_draft.py to verify paragraph count, length, citation format, and absence of scaffolding before producing a handoff for the final delivery stage. - Use Case: After completing a structured literature synthesis on a research topic, invoke this Skill to produce a ~2000-character continuous review draft that can be reviewed and handed off to the document delivery stage. ## Quick Start Take the structured synthesis above and rewrite it as continuous literature review paragraphs in Chinese academic style.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn a literature analysis into review paragraphs?

Provide the structured synthesis containing claim, citation, tension, and gap pools with ready_for_review set to yes. The Skill rewrites it into 3-6 continuous natural paragraphs of about 2000 Chinese characters without adding new content.

What input format does the review writing stage require?

It requires a SYNTHESIS_HANDOFF block with ready_for_review: yes, plus CLAIM_POOL, CITATION_POOL, TENSION_POOL, and GAP_POOL sections, and gate_status must be clear. Missing sections return a BLOCKED status instead of a draft.

Can it add new references or findings during drafting?

No. The drafting stage is strictly limited to upstream material. Any judgment, author, year, method, or result not present in the input pools is deleted or marked as insufficient evidence, and gaps trigger a return to the synthesis stage.

Why does the draft check script fail on my review text?

check_review_draft.py fails drafts with wrong paragraph counts, improper citation formats such as mixing Chinese connectors into English author pairs, leftover headings or lists, or contribution statements like 'this paper'. Fix the flagged issues and rerun the script.

When should this stage be skipped in the research pipeline?

Skip it only when the user explicitly requests no review prose, such as asking for just a list or a single section. Otherwise it is a mandatory stage between research-synthesis and document-delivery in the full pipeline.