review

Automate pull request code reviews against project standards via GitHub API.

Updated Feb 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wutongshenqiu/prism --skill review-wutongshenqiu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/wutongshenqiu/prism/tree/main/.agents/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wutongshenqiu/prism --skill review-wutongshenqiu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires github, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Manually reviewing pull requests for code quality, style, and adherence to project standards is time-consuming and error-prone. This skill automates this process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Review: Automatically review pull requests against project conventions with a single PR number.
  • Customizable Checks: Review against various aspects such as code style, type safety, API conventions, and more.
  • Structured Feedback: Provide a structured review with findings categorized as critical, warning, and info, along with doc impact and verdict.
  • Use Case: When a developer submits a pull request, use this skill to automatically review it and provide feedback based on project standards.

Quick Start

Review PR #12345 using the skill.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a GitHub Pull Request against project standards?

Automated code review for a GitHub Pull Request checks code quality and style against predefined project standards by fetching PR details and diffs via the GitHub API. You can trigger this review process automatically by providing a single PR number.

What is automated Pull Request review and how does it work?

Automated Pull Request review is a process that fetches PR diffs via the GitHub API to validate code against project conventions. It eliminates manual checks by using predefined standards like Rust Edition 2024 conventions and async-trait usage to ensure code consistency.

Can I use automated code review for Rust projects using async-trait and specific error handling?

Yes, automated code review supports Rust projects by checking for specific conventions including Rust Edition 2024, async-trait usage, and error handling. It validates submitted Pull Requests against these predefined project standards to ensure type safety and API conventions are met.

How do I get structured feedback from an automated GitHub code review?

Structured feedback from an automated GitHub code review categorizes findings into critical, warning, and info levels. The review output also includes doc impact assessments and a final verdict, providing a clear overview of code quality and project standard adherence.

Does automated code review require GitHub API access to check a Pull Request?

Yes, automated code review requires GitHub API access to fetch Pull Request details and diffs. This access is necessary to extract the code changes and validate them against the predefined set of project standards and conventions.

What's the best way to ensure code style and type safety in submitted pull requests?

The best way to ensure code style and type safety is to automate code review against project standards upon PR submission. This checks API conventions and code style automatically, providing structured feedback categorized by severity to maintain consistency.