review

Analyze branch diffs against main for SQL safety and trust boundary risks.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/XDCIndia/SkyNet --skill review-xdcindia
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/XDCIndia/SkyNet/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/XDCIndia/SkyNet --skill review-xdcindia

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

PR reviews can be slow and error-prone; this skill analyzes the current branch's diff against main to identify SQL safety issues, LLM trust boundary violations, and other structural risks before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Two-pass review workflow that surfaces critical and informational findings based on a predefined checklist.
  • Enforces SQL data-safety, prompt integrity, and broader structural checks to reduce regression risk.
  • Generates actionable findings and recommended remediations for developers and reviewers.

Quick Start

Run the /review workflow on your branch to generate a structured set of findings and recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate pre-merge PR reviews for SQL safety and LLM trust boundaries?

Automating pre-merge PR reviews involves analyzing your branch diff against main to identify SQL safety risks and LLM trust boundary violations. This skill uses a two-pass workflow with a checklist to generate structured findings and recommended remediations before code merge.

What structural issues can a code review checklist catch before landing a PR?

A pre-landing code review checklist catches SQL data-safety risks, LLM prompt integrity violations, and broader structural consistency issues. By analyzing branch diffs against main, it enforces data protection and trust boundaries to reduce regression risk before merge.

How does the two-pass code review workflow surface critical findings in a PR diff?

A two-pass code review workflow surfaces critical and informational findings by applying a predefined checklist to the current branch diff. It identifies SQL safety issues and LLM trust violations, outputting structured findings to guide developer remediation interactively.

Can I use this automated code review for any git workflow with branch diffs?

Yes, you can use this automated code review across codebases with standard git workflows. It applies to pre-merge PR reviews by analyzing the diff between your current branch and main to check for data safety, prompt integrity, and structural consistency.

Why do I need to check LLM trust boundaries during a pre-merge code review?

Checking LLM trust boundaries during a pre-merge code review prevents prompt integrity violations and unauthorized trust boundary crossings. Analyzing the branch diff ensures structural consistency and data safety, reducing regression risk before the code lands in the main branch.

What is the best way to identify SQL data-safety risks before merging a PR?

The best way to identify SQL data-safety risks is by running an automated review on your current branch diff against main. This process applies a checklist to catch SQL safety issues, LLM trust violations, and structural problems, generating actionable remediation recommendations.