review

Review code changes with multi-agent analysis and confidence-based scoring.

8|1|Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yulonghe97/ystack --skill review-yulonghe97
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/yulonghe97/ystack/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yulonghe97/ystack --skill review-yulonghe97

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code review with multi-agent parallel analysis and confidence-based scoring. Use this skill when the user says 'review', '/review', 'check my work', 'verify', 'did it work', 'is it done', 'review the changes', or after /go completes and the user wants to verify the implementation before shipping. Also supports reviewing external PRs by URL (e.g., '/review owner/repo#123').

Core Features & Use Cases

  • QA-aware goal check — read plan and QA-REPORT.md when present to determine coverage.
  • Multi-agent code review — parallel specialized agents evaluating correctness, security, and maintainability with confidence scores.
  • External PR review support — review diffs from GitHub PRs via gh CLI-like workflow.
  • Diff-based risk assessment — surface only changes and potential issues within the PR/diff.

Quick Start

Initiate a review by saying '/review' or 'check my work' to start the QA-aware review workflow on the current branch or a referenced PR.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a multi-agent code review on my current branch?

Multi-agent code review on a branch is initiated by saying '/review' or 'check my work', triggering parallel analysis of correctness, security, and maintainability with confidence-based scoring to produce structured findings.

Can I review an external GitHub pull request by URL?

Reviewing external GitHub pull requests is supported by providing a URL like '/review owner/repo#123', which retrieves the diff to perform diff-based risk assessment and surface potential issues within the PR.

How does QA-aware verification work for code changes?

QA-aware verification works by reading the plan and QA-REPORT.md when present to determine coverage, outputting a goal-check summary, file-level references, and actionable recommendations alongside the review verdict.

What is the best way to verify implementation before shipping a pull request?

Verifying implementation before shipping is best done by running this QA-aware code review, which applies multi-agent parallel analysis to evaluate changes, assess risks, and provide a final review verdict.

Does the code review support confidence scoring for risk assessment?

Confidence scoring is supported in the code review, where parallel specialized agents evaluate correctness, security, and maintainability, applying confidence scores to their structured findings and risk assessments.