review

Automates GitHub pull-request review with prioritized, actionable output.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/YusukeTsunoda/ppt-trans --skill review-yusuketsunoda
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/YusukeTsunoda/ppt-trans/tree/main/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/YusukeTsunoda/ppt-trans --skill review-yusuketsunoda

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill performs a comprehensive, multi-perspective PR review to identify blockers and opportunities, enabling faster, safer merges.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-perspective analysis: reviewers cover quality, performance, tests, documentation, and security in parallel.
  • Clear outputs: returns Blockers, Suggestions, Nice-to-have items, and a final merge decision.
  • Flexible invocation: use /review [owner/repo] [pr-number] [--focus all|security|perf|qa|docs|types] to tailor the assessment for any PR.

Quick Start

Use the /review command with a valid owner/repo and PR number to initiate a comprehensive PR review.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub PR reviews for security and performance issues?

To automate GitHub PR reviews, provide the owner/repo and PR number to receive a multi-perspective assessment. The review covers security, performance, quality, and documentation in parallel, returning blockers, suggestions, and a merge decision.

Can I focus a pull request review on just one area like security or QA?

You can restrict a pull request review to specific domains by passing the focus parameter with values like security, performance, QA, docs, or types. This constrains the analysis to your chosen area instead of evaluating all domains.

What is the best way to get a merge decision for a GitHub pull request?

The best way to get a merge decision is to run a multi-perspective PR review. It evaluates code quality, performance, tests, and security in parallel, then outputs a formal merge decision alongside blockers, suggestions, and nice-to-have items.

Does multi-angle code review work for analyzing documentation and types?

Multi-angle code review works for analyzing documentation and types. The review skill assesses pull requests across five domains, including docs and types, to identify blockers and opportunities for faster merges.

How do I get actionable suggestions for my GitHub PR blockers?

To get actionable suggestions for GitHub PR blockers, run a parallel multi-perspective review. The output categorizes findings into Blockers, Suggestions, and Nice-to-have items, ensuring maintainers receive clear guidance for merging.

What are the limitations of automated PR review for merge decisions?

Automated PR review limitations include requiring a valid owner/repo and PR number to function. While it provides a formal merge decision, the assessment is constrained by the specified focus areas and does not cover domains outside its five supported categories.