review2-reply

Generate in-place Reply sections for each Rn in a review document.

34|12|Updated Aug 1, 2021
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pear-studio/nonebot-dicepp --skill review2-reply
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review2-reply
Source: https://github.com/pear-studio/nonebot-dicepp/tree/main/docs/agent/skills/review2-reply
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pear-studio/nonebot-dicepp --skill review2-reply

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill converts a review document into consistent, stage-2 Reply sections for each Rn, so disputed or weak review points get rebutted with verifiable execution plans instead of vague agreement.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • In-place Reply writing: Reads the review document and updates each Rn’s Reply block directly in the file.
  • Adversarial ping-pong alignment: Produces rebuttals that match the next stage’s expectation (confirm requires technical substance).
  • Clarification-aware output: Marks hard-to-understand items as 待澄清 so the confirm stage can request missing context.

Quick Start

Provide the review document path to generate Reply sections in-place, and then continue with the next stage by running review3-confirm on the same file.

Frequently Asked Questions about review2-reply

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate technical rebuttals for disputed points in a code review document?

To generate technical rebuttals in a review document, you provide the file path and the Skill batch-updates each review item in-place with a Reply section containing an assessment, technical reason, and actionable execution plan.

What is an adversarial ping-pong workflow for document-based design reviews?

An adversarial ping-pong workflow is a stage-based review process where review items receive structured replies and confirmations. This Skill handles the second stage by writing technical rebuttals directly into the review document.

How do I batch update reply sections in a review file without manual editing?

You can batch update reply sections by supplying the document path. The Skill re-reads the file to verify the stage state and performs a single batch-update write to insert replies for each review item directly in-place.

Can I mark unclear review items for clarification during the rebuttal stage?

Yes, during the reply generation stage, hard-to-understand items are automatically marked as pending clarification. This ensures the subsequent confirm stage can request the missing technical context.

Does the review reply generation process require any specific dependencies or components?

No dependencies or components are required. You only need to supply the review document file path to initiate the in-place batch update for generating stage-2 technical rebuttals.

When should I use an automated review reply generator instead of manually writing rebuttals?

You should use it when you need to convert disputed or weak review points into consistent, verifiable execution plans across multiple items, ensuring technical substance aligns with the next confirm stage without vague agreement.