reviewdoc

Multi-agent document reviews can be automated by coordinating iterative review rounds against templates, ensuring all findings are resolved or escalated. The system reads template files to apply reviewer roles, quality bars, and checklist items consistently.

A template-driven review loop is an automated process that reads review templates to apply specific reviewer roles and checklists to generated documents. It runs multiple rounds until all findings are resolved, producing structured remediation suggestions.

You track documentation changes by running automated reviews that write remediation suggestions as TODO blocks and commit changes via git for traceability. This ensures all modifications and manual review stubs are consistently recorded.

Yes, you can enforce consistent quality across multiple files by using per-type review rules and cross-file targets, supporting multi-file BDD or multi-document reviews within a single automated project review loop.

Yes, you need to create review templates formatted as markdown files to define reviewer roles, the quality bar, and checklist items. The review loop reads these templates to apply the specific rules for each document type.

Unresolved findings are either processed through iterative review rounds until resolved or escalated for manual review. The system surfaces findings in a consistent format and creates stubs to track unresolved issues.