reviewer

Enforce thorough code reviews for correctness, architecture, and security.

Updated Dec 6, 2025

Search Tags:#architecture #security #governance #review #best-practices #quality-assurance #code-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/arttttt/CMIDCABot --skill reviewer-arttttt

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewer
Source: https://github.com/arttttt/CMIDCABot/tree/main/.gemini/skills/reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/arttttt/CMIDCABot --skill reviewer-arttttt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review workflows often miss architectural flaws, security gaps, and correctness issues. This skill provides proactive review guidance to improve code quality and safety.

Core Features & Use Cases

Analyze code for correctness, architecture compliance, edge cases, and security.
Enforce review rules and reporting with clear findings.
Use during PR reviews or after code changes to ensure compliance and safety.

Quick Start

Use the reviewer on the latest changes by invoking a review command to generate a findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a code review for architecture and security compliance?▼

Code review for architecture and security compliance involves analyzing code changes to identify correctness issues, architectural flaws, and security gaps, then formatting these findings into an actionable report without modifying the code itself.

What is the best way to enforce governance checks during a pull request review?▼

Enforcing governance checks during a pull request review involves applying structured review rules that validate architecture compliance and security-focused assessments, generating documented findings to ensure software safety and quality.

Can I use automated code review guidance without applying code changes?▼

Yes, automated code review guidance analyzes correctness, architecture, and security vulnerabilities while strictly enforcing a workflow that performs no code changes, outputting only a structured findings report for governance.

Does code review guidance work for post-change validation and governance checks?▼

Code review guidance works for post-change validation and governance checks by proactively analyzing software changes to ensure they satisfy documented review rules, architecture compliance, and security-focused assessment requirements.

What are the limitations of using proactive code review guidance?▼

The main limitation of proactive code review guidance is that it strictly performs analysis and reporting without executing any code changes, meaning developers must manually address the architectural, security, and correctness findings in the generated report.