reviewer

Code review for architecture and security compliance involves analyzing code changes to identify correctness issues, architectural flaws, and security gaps, then formatting these findings into an actionable report without modifying the code itself.

Enforcing governance checks during a pull request review involves applying structured review rules that validate architecture compliance and security-focused assessments, generating documented findings to ensure software safety and quality.

Yes, automated code review guidance analyzes correctness, architecture, and security vulnerabilities while strictly enforcing a workflow that performs no code changes, outputting only a structured findings report for governance.

Code review guidance works for post-change validation and governance checks by proactively analyzing software changes to ensure they satisfy documented review rules, architecture compliance, and security-focused assessment requirements.

The main limitation of proactive code review guidance is that it strictly performs analysis and reporting without executing any code changes, meaning developers must manually address the architectural, security, and correctness findings in the generated report.