reviewer-common

Standardize code review feedback by defining common frontmatter configurations, output formats, and scoring criteria for backend, frontend, database, security, and infra reviewer agents. This ensures consistent quality and actionable feedback across all specialized roles.

Score design reviews consistently by applying established scoring rubrics and severity levels for feedback. Define clear scoring thresholds and guidelines for different reviewer types to maintain uniform quality standards across all design documents.

Switch between design and implementation review modes by toggling settings based on document inputs for design or diff-driven inputs for implementation. This mode switching ensures the review process targets the correct development phase.

Enforce a uniform output structure for code review scoring by specifying detailed output formats that include scores, evaluations, and action items. This standardizes feedback delivery regardless of the specific reviewer's specialization.

No dependencies are required to set up standardized quality assurance guidelines. The framework operates independently to define operating modes, feedback severity, and scoring thresholds for various reviewer personas.

The framework is limited to defining settings, modes, and scoring criteria for reviewer agents. It standardizes the review process structure but does not perform the actual code or design analysis itself.