Review candidate diffs for scope violations, missing tests, and runtime equivalence.
npx skills add https://github.com/kyleyhw/agent-evolve --skill reviewer-kyleyhw
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: reviewer Source: https://github.com/kyleyhw/agent-evolve/tree/main/.claude/skills/reviewer Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kyleyhw/agent-evolve --skill reviewer-kyleyhw
The reviewer acts as the final gatekeeper to protect the codebase by enforcing critical checks on every candidate. It evaluates scope compliance, ensures test/metric improvements are preserved, validates runtime equivalence in the presence of hypothesized changes, and assesses the coherence of the explorer's hypothesis and conclusion before a candidate can be merged or promoted to a final pull request.
Review the candidate diff and issue a verdict with a structured checklist.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To enforce scope violations and missing test checks on a pull request, the reviewer evaluates candidate diffs against target_files and do-not-touch areas, rejecting non-compliant changes. It provides a structured verdict and detailed checklist to prevent regressions and ensure code quality.
Runtime equivalence validation in code review verifies that hypothesized changes do not alter expected runtime behavior. The reviewer assesses the coherence between the explorer's hypothesis and conclusion to ensure no unsafe changes or regressions slip into the main branch.
You generate a structured quality assurance verdict by reviewing the candidate diff to issue an APPROVE, REQUEST_CHANGES, or REJECT decision. The reviewer outputs a concise verdict alongside a detailed checklist and confidence assessment for human review.
Yes, you can use automated gatekeeping to reject diffs that exceed target files. The reviewer acts as a final gatekeeper, identifying scope compliance violations and blocking candidates that touch do-not-touch areas before they can be merged or promoted to a pull request.
You need a final gatekeeper to assess code coherence before merging when validating runtime-mode equivalence and explorer hypothesis alignment. The reviewer ensures test and metric improvements are preserved and validates that no regressions or unsafe changes occur in the codebase.
Automated code diff reviews for quality assurance rely heavily on the accuracy of the explorer's inputs and defined scope boundaries. The reviewer assesses coherence and reports scope violations based on these inputs, meaning incomplete hypotheses or misconfigured target_files can limit its gatekeeping effectiveness.
kyleyhwCoordinate evolutionary code optimization across isolated branches into a final pull request.
utkudarilmazApply a structured quality checklist to pull requests and generate a markdown report.
AZANIRAnalyze test coverage across requirements traceability, ISO 29119-4 techniques, and code coverage metrics.
Chang-Shih-YungAggregate type checker, linter, and test results into a 0-10 composite score.
