reviewer

You can validate architecture proposals by activating reviewer mode to enforce a structured workflow with templates, checklists, and clear rollback plans before coding begins. This ensures decisions, risks, and requirements are captured and documented.

To generate ADR documentation for refactoring, run a structured proposal workflow that automatically captures architectural decisions and risks. This produces traceable ADR and PR artifacts to govern the implementation.

The best way to enforce structured code reviews for high-risk changes is to apply a validation workflow with built-in checklists and templates. This guarantees architectural decisions and pull requests follow governance standards before merging.

Yes, you can use a structured proposal workflow to capture architectural decisions, assess risks, and define a rollback plan. This ensures traceability and governance before implementation begins.

You need to document ADRs for feature development when planning high-risk changes that require governance and traceability. Generating ADR artifacts before implementation ensures architectural decisions and rollback plans are formally validated.

Yes, the proposal validation workflow handles both ADR and PR generation. By enforcing structured validation before significant changes, it automatically generates both artifacts to ensure full traceability across the development lifecycle.