skills.rest
JunMA98
JunMA98COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

reviewer-response

Convert reviewer comments into structured rebuttal and revision workflows.

3|Updated Mar 11, 2026
Search Tags:#workflow#evidence#review#manuscript#issue-tracking#rebuttal
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/JunMA98/Computer-science-claude-skills --skill reviewer-response
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewer-response
Source: https://github.com/JunMA98/Computer-science-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/reviewer-response
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JunMA98/Computer-science-claude-skills --skill reviewer-response

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Processing and replying to reviewer comments is time-consuming and error-prone. This Skill transforms scattered feedback into a structured rebuttal workflow with an actionable plan and clear traceability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Atomic issue extraction: Normalizes reviewer feedback into discrete, actionable issues with classification.
  • Structured response drafting: Generates concise, evidence-based responses and a claim-evidence-action outline.
  • Revision planning and tracking: Maps each issue to manuscript changes, required experiments, and a revision checklist.
  • Use Case: After a multi-review rejection, triage comments, draft replies, and create a prioritized change log for manuscript revision.

Quick Start

Provide the reviewer decision letter and the current manuscript state to generate an action plan and draft responses.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewer-response

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn reviewer comments into a structured rebuttal workflow?▼

Transform reviewer feedback into a structured rebuttal workflow by extracting discrete issues, drafting evidence-based responses, and mapping each point to a manuscript revision checklist.

What is the best way to draft a rebuttal letter for multiple reviewers?▼

Draft a multi-reviewer rebuttal letter by normalizing feedback into an issue matrix, generating concise claim-evidence-action outlines, and tracking revisions aligned to each specific reviewer concern.

How do I track manuscript revisions and required experiments from reviewer feedback?▼

Track manuscript revisions and required experiments by mapping extracted reviewer issues to specific manuscript changes, generating an actionable revision checklist with clear traceability.

Can I use this workflow for both conference and journal review revisions?▼

Yes, the workflow applies to both conference and journal review revisions, processing decision letters, drafting rebuttals, and planning manuscript revisions across multiple reviewers.

What do I need to start generating a revision plan from a peer review decision letter?▼

Provide the reviewer decision letter and the current manuscript state to generate an action plan, draft responses, and produce an issue matrix for your peer review revision.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
CmochanceCmochance

nature-response

Draft and audit point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family journal revisions.

Community
Advanced
catlog22catlog22
76

scholar-review

Parse reviewer comments and generate structured rebuttal and revision plans.

Community
Advanced
q734738781q734738781
13

scientific-section-synthesis

Draft manuscript sections with citations and a claim-to-evidence map.

Community
Intermediate
yu13130122297yu13130122297

rebuttal

Convert peer review feedback into a structured rebuttal workflow.

Community
Advanced