reviewer-simulator

Name: reviewer-simulator
Availability: InStock
Author: wsxwj123

Simulate academic peer review and generate structured HTML critique reports.

7|Updated Jan 27, 2026

Search Tags:#peer-review #academic-review #manuscript-evaluation #forensic-checks #journal-fit #evidence-anchored

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/wsxwj123/opencode-skills-backup --skill reviewer-simulator

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewer-simulator
Source: https://github.com/wsxwj123/opencode-skills-backup/tree/main/reviewer-simulator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wsxwj123/opencode-skills-backup --skill reviewer-simulator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables rigorous, evidence-driven peer review of manuscripts by simulating a world-class academic reviewer who enforces high standards and strict compliance with defined criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured, forensically-grounded critique: Provides line-by-line evaluation against defined standards, including logic checks, evidence anchors, and transparency requirements.
Target journal fit and standards alignment: Assesses manuscript alignment with journal scope, ethical considerations, and reporting guidelines.
Evidence-anchored feedback: Outputs specific citations to manuscript sections and figures, with a clear plan for revision priorities and responder strategy.

Quick Start

Provide the manuscript draft and target journal to generate an HTML critique report with a Chinese template.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewer-simulator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get automated peer review for my manuscript submission?▼

Automated peer review requires providing your manuscript draft and target journal to simulate a top-tier reviewer. The tool evaluates logical coherence, evidence anchoring, and journal fit, generating a structured HTML critique report for revision guidance.

What is evidence-anchored manuscript evaluation and how does it work?▼

Evidence-anchored manuscript evaluation checks academic rigor by tracing claims back to specific citations within the text and figures. This peer-review simulation enforces transparency requirements, ensuring conclusions are supported by explicit references to manuscript sections.

Can I check if my paper meets the ethical considerations and reporting guidelines of a target journal?▼

Yes, you can assess journal fit and standards alignment by providing the manuscript and target journal. The evaluation explicitly checks methodological rigor, ethical considerations, and compliance with defined reporting guidelines for that specific publication scope.

How do I generate a structured critique report for an academic manuscript draft?▼

To generate a structured critique report, provide the manuscript draft and target journal name to the reviewer simulator. It outputs a forensically-grounded HTML document containing line-by-line logic checks, evidence anchors, and a prioritized revision plan.

Does the peer-review simulation provide specific feedback on manuscript figures and sections?▼

Yes, the peer-review simulation provides evidence-anchored feedback by outputting specific citations to manuscript sections and figures. It delivers a clear plan for revision priorities and responder strategy based on these targeted references.

Are there limitations to using automated manuscript evaluation for journal fit assessment?▼

Automated manuscript evaluation simulates reviewer standards but cannot replace human judgment for final publication decisions. It enforces consistency and traceability in checking logic and evidence, yet complex subjective nuances in journal fit may still require expert editorial review.