reviewing

Name: reviewing
Availability: InStock
Author: wthrk

Run self-review and Codex review in parallel and output a reconciled report.

Updated Jan 27, 2026

Search Tags:#codex #reporting #consensus #parallel #review #code-review #self-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/wthrk/agent-tools --skill reviewing

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewing
Source: https://github.com/wthrk/agent-tools/tree/main/skills/reviewing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wthrk/agent-tools --skill reviewing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill streamlines content evaluation by running self-review and Codex review in parallel and delivering a reconciled set of findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

Parallel reviews: executes self-review and Codex review concurrently to speed up feedback.
Reconciliation & reporting: compares results, surfaces agreements and disagreements, and outputs a structured final report.
Use Case: ideal for code reviews, documentation reviews, PR reviews, and any content requiring objective assessment and quality signals.

Quick Start

Run a dual-review on the target content to obtain a unified assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I run a parallel code review and reconcile the findings?▼

Parallel code review executes self-review and Codex review concurrently, then compares results to surface agreements and disagreements into a structured final report.

Can I use a dual-review workflow for PR and documentation reviews?▼

Yes, dual-review workflows apply to PR reviews, documentation reviews, and any content requiring objective evaluation, delivering a reconciled set of findings with clear recommendations.

What is the best way to automate consensus reporting for code reviews?▼

Automated consensus reporting for code reviews is achieved by running self-review and Codex review in parallel, then reconciling the dual outputs into a structured final report.

Does parallel self-review work without external dependencies?▼

Yes, parallel self-review and Codex review operate without external dependencies, executing concurrently to speed up feedback and deliver objective assessment signals.

How do I get a structured final report from a Codex review?▼

A structured final report from a Codex review is generated by reconciling its parallel execution with self-review, outputting clear locations, issues, and recommendations.

When should I use a reconciled dual-review approach for content evaluation?▼

Use a reconciled dual-review approach for content evaluation when you need objective quality signals from parallel self-review and Codex review, ensuring comprehensive assessment.