skills.rest
dhruvbaldawa
dhruvbaldawaCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@dhruvbaldawaGitHub

reviewing-code

Review code submissions for security, quality, performance, and test coverage.

31|3|Updated Oct 26, 2025
Search Tags:#automation#security#agents#quality#review#code-review#test-coverage
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dhruvbaldawa/ccconfigs --skill reviewing-code-dhruvbaldawa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewing-code
Source: https://github.com/dhruvbaldawa/ccconfigs/tree/main/experimental/skills/reviewing-code
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dhruvbaldawa/ccconfigs --skill reviewing-code-dhruvbaldawa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates comprehensive code reviews by coordinating multiple domain-specific agents to assess security, quality, performance, and test coverage, ensuring accountable findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel triple-agent review: Security Gatekeeper, Quality Guardian, and Test Auditor run simultaneously to surface domain-specific findings.
  • Accountable triage: Each agent provides signed decisions and rationales, enabling deterministic release choices.
  • Flexible task sources: Works with code task files located at .plans/<project>/review/NNN-task.md and supports incremental updates.

Quick Start

Place your task file at .plans/<project>/review/NNN-task.md and run the review automation.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewing-code

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does parallel code review with multiple agents work?▼

Parallel code review runs specialized agents simultaneously to assess security, quality, performance, and test coverage. Each agent provides signed decisions and rationales, enabling auditable, domain-specific findings with triangulated results.

How do I automate code reviews for security and test coverage?▼

To automate code reviews, place your task file at .plans/<project>/review/NNN-task.md and run the review automation. The system coordinates parallel agents to evaluate security, quality, performance, and test coverage.

What's the best way to review code submissions for security and quality?▼

The best way to review code submissions is using a triple-agent approach with a Security Gatekeeper, Quality Guardian, and Test Auditor running in parallel to surface domain-specific findings and provide accountable triage.

Do I need a specific file format to run automated code reviews?▼

Yes, you need to place your code task files at .plans/<project>/review/NNN-task.md. The review system reads these task files to apply agent-based prompts and parallel execution for auditable decisions.

Can I use parallel review agents for incremental code updates?▼

Yes, the parallel review agents support incremental updates. The system processes code task files located at .plans/<project>/review/NNN-task.md and can run reviews on updated submissions to provide new domain-specific findings.

What limitations exist when using automated agents for code review?▼

Automated code review agents require task files stored at .plans/<project>/review/NNN-task.md and depend on agent-based prompts with parallel execution. Without this specific file structure, the review automation cannot run.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
jinglemansweepjinglemansweep

jp-codereview

Generate structured code review issues from phase artifacts into YAML cycle files.

Community
Advanced
ZhanlinCuiZhanlinCui
178

dispatching-parallel-agents

Dispatch parallel agents to investigate independent failures and aggregate findings.

Community
Basic
KrismithReddy12KrismithReddy12

health

Calculate a weighted 0-10 code quality score from linters and test runners.

Community
Advanced
CaptainCrouton89CaptainCrouton89
497

Reviewing Code

Evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment.

Community
Basic