reviewing-impl-plans

Auditing implementation plans requires verifying that every handoff between parallel work streams defines explicit request, response, and error contracts, complete data schemas, and protocol definitions to prevent integration failures.

Verifying implementation plan references means ensuring all citations to existing codebase elements point to verified sources rather than relying on method names, actively flagging fabrication patterns to maintain traceable decisions.

Interface contract auditing is the process of checking that every dependency map and handoff between parallel work streams contains explicit request, response, and error contracts, ensuring complete interfaces and preventing integration gaps in derived plans.

Implementation plan review supports risk management by tracking gaps, risks, and escalation paths to fact-checking when needed. It ensures complete dependency mapping and behavior verification to manage integration risks across parallel work streams.

Preventing integration gaps requires comparing interfaces, behaviors, and dependencies across parallel work streams against parent design documents. You must enforce explicit interface contracts and maintain a complete dependency map to stop failures before integration.

Yes, you need a complete dependency map to review an implementation plan effectively. Mapping dependencies is required to compare interfaces and behaviors across parallel work streams, ensuring no integration gaps exist between contract handoffs.