Verified:GitHub

reviewing-market-competitive-prior-art-survey

Reviews market and competitive prior-art survey artifacts against 40 numbered acceptance conditions.

1|1|Updated May 24, 2026

Search Tags:#acceptance criteria #market research #competitive analysis #review gate #quality review #prior art survey #competitor register

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/bm629/agent-skills --skill reviewing-market-competitive-prior-art-survey-bm629

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewing-market-competitive-prior-art-survey
Source: https://github.com/bm629/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/reviewing-market-competitive-prior-art-survey
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bm629/agent-skills --skill reviewing-market-competitive-prior-art-survey-bm629

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Market and competitive research artifacts often look complete while hiding survivorship bias, conflated zero-results with source failures, or vendor marketing restated as fact. This Skill acts as an acceptance gate that judges a finished survey artifact against a single-sourced bar before it is approved. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Condition-based review: Judges vocabulary maps, per-angle search outputs, extract records, and competitor registers against 40 numbered conditions in references/conditions.md. - Grounded findings: Every finding names its condition number and quotes the failing artifact text; ungrounded observations are excluded. - Proportionality filter: Approves thin-but-honest results for thin markets and revises only on named, unrecorded gaps, preventing padding. - Use Case: After producing a competitor register with the paired authoring skill, run this reviewer to verify that zero-hit cells are recorded honestly, ratings carry denominators, and dead products are dated, then fold every blocker before acceptance. ## Quick Start Use reviewing-market-competitive-prior-art-survey to judge the competitor register in docs/research/ before I approve it.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewing-market-competitive-prior-art-survey

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review a competitive analysis artifact before accepting it?▼

Run this reviewer on the finished artifact after the deterministic gate passes. It walks the judgment conditions in references/conditions.md, quotes failing text for each finding, and emits exactly one verdict line: VERDICT: approve or VERDICT: revise.

What artifacts does the market prior-art survey reviewer accept?▼

It judges market vocabulary maps, per-angle search outputs, extract records, and competitor registers with their reports. It does not review UI-convention, user-research, code, or regulatory surveys, which have their own reviewing skills.

Can the reviewer fix or rewrite the survey artifact it rejects?▼

No. The reviewer never authors or proposes replacement text. It names each gap with its condition number and quoted evidence, and the producing skill closes the findings in a revise round.

Why does a zero-result search cell pass review instead of failing?▼

A reached cell with returned: 0 and a real query is a receipt proving the search ran, which makes absence provable. Revising an honest zero is treated as the most damaging false finding; only unrecorded gaps trigger a revise.

When should I not use this competitive survey reviewer?▼

Do not use it to author artifacts, to review artifacts that have not passed the deterministic shape gate, or to judge surveys outside the market and competitive domain. It also does not re-litigate the angle taxonomy defined in the source registry.