reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey

Reviews scale prior-art survey artifacts against numbered conditions and returns a verdict.

1|1|Updated May 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bm629/agent-skills --skill reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey-bm629
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey
Source: https://github.com/bm629/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bm629/agent-skills --skill reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey-bm629

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Deterministic gates can validate schema and counts for scale prior-art artifacts, but they cannot judge faithfulness: whether a declared load band matches the handed scope, whether a measured number is the source's own figure, or whether an absence is recorded with its receipt. This Skill performs that blind review and returns an actionable verdict. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Condition-based review: Judges one artifact of one kind (keyword-map, search, extract, or synthesis) against numbered conditions C1-C46 grouped per artifact kind. - Evidence-aware findings: Records conditions as unjudgeable when required staged evidence is missing, never guessing or passing them silently. - Strict verdict contract: Emits numbered findings naming their condition, then exactly one VERDICT: approve or revise as the last line. - Use Case: After a scale vocabulary map passes its deterministic gate, run this review to catch a fabricated load band or expansions invented to look thorough before the map feeds downstream search angles. ## Quick Start Use reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey to review the staged keyword-map artifact and give me findings with a verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a scale prior-art survey artifact?

Hand the reviewer one artifact of one kind — keyword-map, search, extract, or synthesis — after it has passed its deterministic gate. The reviewer reads the matching condition group in references/conditions.md, checks the staged evidence, and returns findings plus one verdict.

What does the reviewing-scale-prior-art-survey skill check?

It judges faithfulness the gate cannot: whether the declared band matches the handed scope, whether measured values are the source's own numbers, whether configuration_stated and primary_dimension are accurate, and whether absences carry receipts. It never re-runs schema or count checks.

When should I run this review versus the deterministic gate?

Run the deterministic gate first; it validates schema, enums, and counts and returns early on failure. Run this review only after the gate passes, since the conditions deliberately avoid restating anything the gate already decides.

What happens if required evidence files are not staged for review?

Any condition whose required evidence was not staged is recorded as unjudgeable and stated as such in the output. The reviewer never guesses at missing evidence and never marks an unverifiable condition as passed.

What are the limitations of this prior-art review?

It reviews one artifact of one kind per run and does not judge prose quality or score the underlying source. It also cannot decide anything the deterministic gate owns, such as field presence, enum membership, or count reconciliation.