reviewing-skills

To audit a Claude Skill, you evaluate its SKILL.md frontmatter, body structure, and references against an official best-practices checklist, generating a structured review report with prioritized fixes and suggested enhancements.

A Claude Skill quality check report includes concrete action items with priority levels, covering metadata improvements, content fixes, and workflow enhancements based on the best-practices checklist assessment.

You check SKILL.md compliance by assessing its frontmatter, body structure, and references against the best-practices checklist, which identifies structural gaps and prerequisite documentation issues to produce concrete correction suggestions.

Yes, you can review Claude Skill metadata and workflows without external dependencies, as the audit process relies solely on comparing the SKILL.md content and references against the built-in best-practices checklist.

The best way to improve Claude Skill documentation quality is to run a structured review that compares the SKILL.md against the best-practices checklist, yielding a language-specific report with prioritized fixes for metadata, content, and workflows.

Your Claude Skill may fail the best-practices checklist review due to missing or non-compliant frontmatter, inadequate body structure, missing references, or undocumented workflows identified during the audit process.