reviewing-tests

Verify test assertions by applying a four-phase review protocol that validates spec structure, evidentiary integrity, lower-level assumptions, and ADR/PDR compliance to detect evidence gaps and reject falsely passing tests.

An adversarial test check identifies silent skips, misaligned testing strategies, and assertion gaps in unit and integration tests. You need it to ensure your CI pipeline does not pass falsely due to unvalidated or weakly linked test evidence.

Review test suites by running a protocol that enforces typed assertion formats and verifies inline or test file linkage. This evidentiary integrity phase ensures every assertion is directly supported by concrete test logic.

Yes, you can use this foundational test review methodology across stacks. It supports language-specific extensions for Python and TypeScript tests to enforce consistent evidentiary standards and typed assertion formats across varied CI environments.

The best way to identify silent skips and misaligned strategies is to execute a rigorous test coverage review that checks for adversarial gaps and enforces proper level testing, generating concrete rejection guidance for unsupported assertions.

Yes, reviewing tests requires spec-driven reviews and ADR/PDR compliance to validate foundational assumptions. The protocol checks lower-level assumptions and architectural decision records to ensure tests align with intended design specifications.