reviewing-typescript-architecture

To review an ADR for testing principles in TypeScript architecture, submit the document for analysis. It checks for mocking prohibition, dependency injection, and testing strategy inclusion, returning specific feedback on any violations found.

An Architectural Decision Record should include testing principles such as mocking prohibition, dependency injection, and a defined testing strategy with level assignments. It must align with higher-level architectural decisions to ensure robust design.

To identify testing principle violations in ADRs, analyze the document against established rules. The review pinpoints specific lines where principles are violated, references the exact principles broken, and demonstrates correct architectural approaches with code examples.

Yes, the ADR review process supports TypeScript dependency injection patterns. It analyzes architectural decision records specifically for adherence to dependency injection principles and provides corrective guidance with code examples when violations are identified.

The best way to enforce mocking prohibition in architectural decisions is to review ADRs against defined testing principles. This process identifies where unnecessary mocking is proposed, references the violated principle, and demonstrates refactored architectural approaches with code examples.

Your ADR needs a testing strategy with level assignments because it ensures adherence to established testing principles. Reviewing for this inclusion prevents common architectural pitfalls, promotes robust TypeScript design, and aligns decisions with higher-level architecture.