revise

Parse reviewer comments and generate a structured Response to Reviewers document.

243|60|Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill revise-aperivue
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: revise
Source: https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills/tree/main/skills/revise
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill revise-aperivue

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill automates the extraction and organization of reviewer feedback, generating a structured Response to Reviewers document with tracked manuscript changes to streamline revision workflows.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comment parsing: Extracts reviewer and editor comments, assigns MAJOR, MINOR, or REBUTTAL tags, and numbers items for traceability.
  • Response generation: Produces a formatted Response to Reviewers document and a cover letter for editors.
  • Workflow coordination: Coordinates with /analyze-stats and /make-figures when new analyses or visuals are required during revision.

Quick Start

Provide reviewer feedback to trigger the revision workflow and request a sample revision letter to see the formatted output.

Frequently Asked Questions about revise

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured response to peer reviewers for academic manuscript revision?

To generate a response to reviewers, provide the peer reviewer feedback to the workflow. It parses comments, assigns MAJOR, MINOR, or REBUTTAL tags, and produces a formatted response letter with tracked manuscript changes.

Can I automatically create an editor cover letter when revising my manuscript?

Yes, you can create an editor cover letter automatically. The revision workflow processes reviewer feedback and culminates in generating both a formatted Response to Reviewers document and a ready-to-submit editor cover letter.

How do I handle reviewer comments that require new statistical analyses or figures during revision?

For reviewer comments requiring new analyses or visuals, the revision workflow coordinates directly with statistical analysis and figure generation tools, ensuring new data outputs are incorporated into your manuscript changes.

What is the best way to organize major and minor reviewer comments for traceability?

The best way to organize reviewer comments is by parsing them and numbering each item. The workflow classifies feedback as MAJOR, MINOR, or REBUTTAL, assigning tracking numbers to ensure every point is traceable in your response document.

Does the revision workflow support rebuttals when disagreeing with peer reviewer suggestions?

Yes, the revision workflow supports rebuttals. It explicitly classifies reviewer comments into a REBUTTAL category, allowing you to structure structured disagreement and justify your manuscript decisions clearly in the response letter.