What problem does it solve? A proposal that passes compliance review can still fail on quality — vague language, inconsistent tone, missing differentiators, and a narrative that does not persuade evaluators. This Skill performs a structured editorial review of a draft proposal against your firm's configurable voice standards, logging every finding to a SharePoint Review Findings list and annotating the draft. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Narrative Coherence Assessment: Evaluates whether the executive summary's value proposition is substantiated by body sections and whether the argument builds logically across the document. - Section-by-Section Quality Review: Checks opening framing, specificity of evidence, differentiator reinforcement, transitions, and length proportionality against evaluation criteria weighting. - Line-Level Language Checks: Flags weak language patterns (vague superlatives, promotional enthusiasm, passive constructions), tone inconsistencies, and terminology drift, each with severity ratings and suggested rewrites. - Use Case: After compliance review and salesperson corrections on an RFP response, run this Skill to catch that a priority differentiator is absent from the document and that Section 3 reads as a methodology description rather than a response to the client's challenge — before the proposal goes to final formatting. ## Quick Start Fill in the Firm Profile values in SKILL.md, then ask Copilot in SharePoint to run the quality and tone review on the corrected draft proposal in the WIP Collaboration Folder.
