What problem does it solve? Comparing a pile of returned RFQ/RFP responses is slow and inconsistent when done by hand. This Skill turns supplier responses into a defensible sourcing decision by applying weighted scoring, total cost of ownership modeling, and supplier risk assessment, then naming a winning bidder with documented rationale. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Weighted supplier scoring: Scores each supplier across five areas (capability, technical/quality, supply chain, cost, partnership) on a 10-point scale with configurable weight presets (default, aggressive, quality-first). - TCO modeling: Builds Year 1–5 total cost of ownership breakouts covering unit price, logistics, duty, quality cost, payment term value, and currency exposure. - Three mandatory deliverables: Produces an Excel scoring workbook (openpyxl/pandas/xlsxwriter), a self-contained multi-tab HTML dashboard (radar, TCO, risk heat map, comparison), and an executive markdown recommendation. - Use Case: Point the Skill at a folder of supplier workbooks after an RFP closes; it scores every bidder, flags financial/quality/cyber risks, classifies suppliers as strategic, preferred, or transactional, and recommends single-source or dual-source award. ## Quick Start Run the rfq-analysis skill on my folder of supplier RFP responses to score the bids, model total cost of ownership, and recommend a winning supplier.
