rfx-scoring

Normalizes RFx bids to total cost of ownership and scores weighted award recommendations.

Updated Aug 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MetaFloor-AI/metafloor-scm-plugin-openai --skill rfx-scoring-metafloor-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rfx-scoring
Source: https://github.com/MetaFloor-AI/metafloor-scm-plugin-openai/tree/main/skills/business-workflows/rfx-scoring
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MetaFloor-AI/metafloor-scm-plugin-openai --skill rfx-scoring-metafloor-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? When an RFx closes, bids arrive in mixed incoterms, currencies, and payment terms that resist apples-to-apples comparison, and buyers under deadline pressure default to the raw low bid — which often hides freight costs, defect history, and solvency risk. This Skill levels every bid to one total-cost-of-ownership basis, scores a weighted scorecard on locked weights, and stages a defensible, audit-ready award recommendation. ## Core Features & Use Cases - TCO Normalization: Converts every quote to a common basis by adding landed freight/duty, payment-terms cost of cash, expected cost of poor quality from PPM history, priceable risk mitigation, and amortized one-time costs. - Weighted Scorecard with Hard Risk Floor: Scores price, quality, delivery, risk, and sustainability on weights locked before bids open, with a hard gate preventing below-floor suppliers from taking a sole award. - Award Shaping and Gating: Prices sole vs split award options, computes the split premium, and holds bidder notifications as the irreversible commit boundary pending human approval. - Use Case: Four bids close on a $12M machined-component category 48 hours before the incumbent lapses; the Skill shows the headline 8%-under EXW bid actually ranks last on TCO and fails the risk floor, recommending a sole or 70/30 split award with quantified savings. ## Quick Start Score the closed RFx bids for the machined-component category, normalize them to TCO, and recommend a sole or split award before the incumbent contract lapses.

Frequently Asked Questions about rfx-scoring

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compare RFx bids with different incoterms and currencies?

Normalize every bid to one total-cost-of-ownership basis before comparing: convert currencies at a single FX rate locked at RFx close, add inbound freight, duty, and insurance so all bids sit at the same delivery point, then add payment-terms cost of cash and expected cost of poor quality.

How do I build a weighted supplier scorecard for an RFQ award?

Score five criteria 0-100 — price from normalized TCO, quality from PPM history, delivery from OTIF, risk from financial health, and sustainability from ESG ratings — then apply weights locked before bids open. Default weights are Price 35%, Quality 25%, Delivery 15%, Risk 15%, Sustainability 10%.

When should I split an award between two suppliers instead of sole sourcing?

Split when the top scorer carries elevated-but-acceptable risk, cannot cover full volume, or when a qualified second source is worth the premium. Compute the split premium as split TCO minus sole TCO and surface it as a number for the category manager to weigh against resilience value.

Can a low bid win an RFx award on price alone?

No. A supplier scoring below the risk floor (default 35) cannot take a sole award at any price — only a minority split or disqualification. The floor is locked before bids open and cannot be lowered ad hoc to let a cheap but financially weak bid win.

Why does the cheapest quote often rank last after TCO normalization?

Raw quotes exclude freight, duty, defect costs, and risk mitigation. An EXW offshore quote 8% under the field can land above domestic DDP bids once landed costs, PPM-based quality costs, and safety stock for unreliable lead times are priced in.

What are the limitations of scoring a single-bid or thin-field RFx?

With one or two bids, the best-in-field price ratio is near-meaningless since the sole bid scores 100 by construction. Score price against a should-cost model instead, still apply the risk floor, and recommend re-sourcing or negotiation if the bid fails should-cost.