rhzy-counterclaim-playbook

Generates counterclaim playbooks with legal bases, contract clauses, and SOPs for construction disputes.

Updated Sep 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki --skill rhzy-counterclaim-playbook-pinedu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rhzy-counterclaim-playbook
Source: https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki/tree/main/skills/rhzy-counterclaim-playbook
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki --skill rhzy-counterclaim-playbook-pinedu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? When contractors, surveyors, designers, or supervisors cause losses on a construction project, the project owner lacks a standardized way to pursue counterclaims. This Skill provides ready-made counterclaim playbooks covering six dispute scenarios, each with the responsible party, legal basis, contract basis, and step-by-step handling procedure. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Six Counterclaim Scenarios: Covers survey omissions, contractor quality defects, schedule delays, wage arrears, design errors, and supervisor negligence, each with a four-part kit (responsible party, legal basis, contract basis, handling SOP). - Time-Bound Claim Procedures: Enforces the 7/14/28-day claim notice and report deadlines from standard contracts GF-2016-0203 and GF-2017-0201, including escalation to arbitration at the Guiyang Arbitration Commission. - Approval Hierarchy and Document Templates: Maps claim amounts and delay durations to approval levels, and lists six document templates such as the Claim Intent Notice and Counterclaim Letter. - Use Case: When a karst cave is discovered during excavation that contradicts the survey report, use this Skill to generate the claim intent notice within 7 days, cite the Quality Management Regulation Articles 19-20, and plan recovery of treatment costs from the survey unit. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to draft a counterclaim plan against the survey unit for the undiscovered karst cave at the Yunling Center project, including legal citations and the claim timeline.

Frequently Asked Questions about rhzy-counterclaim-playbook

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I file a counterclaim against a survey unit for missed geological findings?

Follow the Scenario A playbook: lock down evidence within 3 days, send a Claim Intent Notice within 7 days, and submit the Claim Report within 14 days citing Quality Management Regulation Articles 19-20 and contract GF-2016-0203 clauses 5.1, 14.2.2, and 15.1.

What legal basis applies to contractor quality defect claims in China?

The Construction Quality Management Regulation Articles 26, 32, and 64 establish contractor liability for defects, requiring rework and imposing fines of 2-4% of contract value for substandard materials or deviation from drawings, plus compensation for losses.

How are construction delay claims classified by responsibility?

Delays split into four categories: design changes allow schedule extension without penalty, contractor-caused delays trigger counterclaims, force majeure splits costs proportionally, and owner-caused delays grant extensions plus idle labor costs.

What are the claim notice deadlines under standard Chinese construction contracts?

Under contract GF-2016-0203 clause 15.1, the owner must send a claim intent notice within 7 days of the event, submit the claim report within 14 days, and the counterparty must respond within 28 days or the claim is deemed accepted.

When must the project owner advance unpaid migrant worker wages?

Under the Wage Payment Regulation Article 29, the owner advances wages only up to the unsettled project payment amount, requires leadership approval, uses emergency funds rather than the dedicated wage account, and then recovers from the contractor per Article 30.

What are the limitations of using standardized counterclaim playbooks?

The playbooks require verification that cited regulations are archived in the local law wiki, mandate third-party cost auditing for claim amounts, and prohibit self-drafted clauses without owner confirmation, so unverified scenarios need manual legal review.