What problem does it solve? When AI assistants answer questions involving laws, regulations, article numbers, statutory periods, or penalty amounts, they often fabricate clause numbers or quote from memory, producing legally unreliable output. This Skill acts as a mandatory gatekeeper that blocks any legal citation unless it includes the exact article number, verbatim original text, document name with official decree number, and an archived source URL. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Four-part citation gate: Requires article number (to the paragraph/item level), unabridged original text, full document name with decree number, and a four-layer archived URL before any legal content can be output. - National vs. provincial standard dual-track judgment: For Guizhou construction projects, compares national statutes against stricter provincial rules (labor contracts, wage bonds, signage, data retention) using a reference comparison table. - Pitfall prevention playbook: Eleven documented failure patterns covering hallucinated clauses, contradictory archive status markers, misquoted statutes in user prompts, and unverifiable local documents, each with a correction protocol. - Use Case: When asked how many years a roof waterproofing warranty lasts, the Skill forces a lookup of the archived Regulation on Construction Quality Management, quotes Article 40 verbatim, and marks anything not archived as pending verification instead of guessing. ## Quick Start Before answering any question that mentions a law, regulation, article number, warranty period, or penalty amount, load this Skill and verify the citation against the archived statute files.
