rhzy-output-format

Standardizes construction wage-arrears risk consultation outputs into structured Chinese report templates.

Updated Sep 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki --skill rhzy-output-format-pinedu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rhzy-output-format
Source: https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki/tree/main/skills/rhzy-output-format
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki --skill rhzy-output-format-pinedu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Construction risk consultation agents often produce inconsistent, overly verbose, or reasoning-heavy outputs. This Skill enforces a standardized output format for wage-arrears risk consultations from the construction unit's perspective, ensuring users see only final conclusions in a consistent structure. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Scenario-based output switching: Intermediate decision-tree nodes output only 3 sections (current question, user answer, next credential requirements), while leaf nodes trigger a full 8-module consultation report. - Structured 8-module template: Covers event characterization, fact summary, core issues, decision-tree positioning, legal risk warnings, action lists (24h/3-day/7-day), and next-step guidance. - Strict formatting rules: Hides internal reasoning, enforces legal citation format (e.g., 《保障农民工工资支付条例》第二十九条), urgency markers (🔴🟠🟡🟢), and simplified/minimal variants on request. - Use Case: When a construction-risk workflow agent reaches a conclusion about unpaid migrant worker wages, this Skill formats the result into a compliant consultation opinion document with action items and legal references. ## Quick Start Format the construction risk consultation result using the standard output template for a leaf-node scenario.

Frequently Asked Questions about rhzy-output-format

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize construction risk consultation report output?

Apply a scenario-based template: intermediate decision-tree nodes output only the current question, user answer, and next credential requirements, while leaf nodes output a full 8-module consultation opinion including legal risks and action lists.

What sections should a wage arrears risk consultation report include?

A complete report includes event characterization, fact summary table, core issues, decision-tree node positioning, legal risk warnings with statute citations, a time-boxed action list (24h/3-day/7-day), and next-step guidance.

How should legal regulations be cited in consultation outputs?

Use the full regulation name in book-title marks plus the article number, for example 《保障农民工工资支付条例》第二十九条. This format keeps citations precise and verifiable for construction compliance contexts.

When should intermediate reasoning be hidden from consultation output?

Internal reasoning such as gating results, rule-matching derivations, and attack reports should always be hidden from end users. Users should only see finalized conclusions, with intermediate nodes limited to 3 output items.

Can the consultation output be shortened for quick reading?

Yes, two reduced variants exist on user request: a condensed version omitting the legal risk module and keeping only urgent actions, and a minimal version keeping only characterization, facts, action list, and next steps.