rhzy-skill1-contractor-risk-assessment

What problem does it solve? Evaluating whether a construction contractor is trustworthy requires checking judicial records, administrative penalties, qualifications, and financial health across many government data sources, which is slow and error-prone when done manually. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Seven-Dimension Weighted Scoring: Scores judicial risk (20%), administrative penalties (20%), entity qualification (15%), financial health (15%), performance capability (15%), associated risk (10%), and business anomalies (5%). - Red-Line Veto Rules: Instantly flags or disqualifies contractors for dishonesty judgments, expired safety licenses, or excessive penalties, with a stricter one-vote-veto mode triggered by keywords like "一票否决". - Four-Tier Output: Produces red/orange/yellow/blue risk ratings plus a risk item list and recommended control measures. - Use Case: Before awarding a subcontract, input a company's name or unified social credit code to receive a structured risk rating report based on Tianyancha, Qichacha, and government platform data. ## Quick Start Assess the risk level of contractor [company name] and give me the red/orange/yellow/blue rating with a risk list and recommended measures.