rhzy-skill2-legal-counsel

Generates compliance conclusions, legal bases, and action plans for construction project legal issues.

Updated Sep 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki --skill rhzy-skill2-legal-counsel-pinedu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rhzy-skill2-legal-counsel
Source: https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki/tree/main/skills/rhzy-skill2-legal-counsel
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pinedu/xmc-work-wiki --skill rhzy-skill2-legal-counsel-pinedu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Construction project owners face legal uncertainty at every stage: whether a planned action is compliant, how to respond to an unfolding incident, and how to mitigate damage after a violation occurs. This Skill provides structured legal counsel for construction units (建设单位), delivering clear conclusions backed by specific statutory clauses instead of vague warnings. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three Response Engines: Pre-event compliance预判 (can do / cannot do / conditionally can do + legal basis + compliant alternatives), in-event emergency response (prioritized action checklist + deadlines + consequences of inaction), and post-event crisis handling (worst-case prediction + mitigation measures). - Regulation Knowledge Graph: Organizes statutes, interpretations, hierarchical relationships (上位法/下位法, 一般法/特别法), judicial interpretations, mandatory standards, penalty cases, and judicial precedents with validity labels (current / revised / repealed / upcoming). - Use Case: A project manager asks whether they can skip public bidding and directly award a contract to a familiar contractor. The Skill returns a clear conclusion, the specific clauses of the Bidding Law that apply, the risks involved, and compliant alternatives such as invited bidding or competitive negotiation. ## Quick Start Ask the legal counsel skill whether directly awarding a construction contract without public bidding is compliant and what alternatives exist.

Frequently Asked Questions about rhzy-skill2-legal-counsel

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check if a planned construction action is legally compliant?

Describe the planned action including project nature, funding source, and contract amount. The pre-event engine identifies the action type, matches applicable regulations, and returns a conclusion of can do, cannot do, or conditionally can do, with specific clauses and compliant alternatives.

What should I do when a compliance incident happens on a construction site?

Describe the incident, such as discovering suspected cultural relics during excavation. The emergency response engine classifies the event, assesses violation severity against specific clauses, and outputs a prioritized action checklist with deadlines and worst-case consequences.

Does this legal counsel cover post-accident liability allocation?

No. Post-accident liability allocation is delegated to a separate skill (rhzy-skill4-incident-duty-allocation) using its three-question assessment method. This skill focuses on statutory clauses, contract validity, regulatory applicability, and pre-event prediction.

How are regulations organized for legal lookup in construction compliance?

Regulations are structured as a knowledge graph containing statute text, plain-language interpretations, hierarchical relationships between upper and lower laws, general versus special laws, judicial interpretations, mandatory standards, penalty cases, and judicial precedents, each tagged with validity status.

Why must legal conclusions cite specific clauses instead of general statements?

Citing specific clauses makes conclusions verifiable and actionable, whereas vague statements like violating relevant regulations provide no basis for decision-making. The skill requires every conclusion to reference exact statutory provisions with current validity labels.