ring:dev-validation

Require explicit user approval before completing development tasks.

Updated Mar 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LucasMalessa/TheRing --skill ring-dev-validation-lucasmalessa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ring:dev-validation
Source: https://github.com/LucasMalessa/TheRing/tree/main/dev-team/skills/dev-validation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LucasMalessa/TheRing --skill ring-dev-validation-lucasmalessa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Gate 5 final validation ensures explicit user approval before completion, preventing unverified deliverables and misalignment with requirements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a formal post-review sign-off to lock in acceptance criteria and evidence.
  • Coordinates automated checks, review gates, and human decision-making to prevent premature closure.
  • Use Case: When a feature reaches Gate 5, present evidence and collect explicit approval to proceed or revert.

Quick Start

Provide explicit APPROVED or REJECTED decision after reviewing the validation evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about ring:dev-validation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce explicit approval before completing development tasks?

To collect explicit approval, present the validation evidence to the reviewer and require a formal APPROVED or REJECTED decision, which then triggers the next steps for feedback loops or remediation.

Why does final validation prevent unverified deliverables in code review workflows?

Final validation prevents unverified deliverables by enforcing a formal post-review sign-off that locks in acceptance criteria and evidence, coordinating automated checks and human decision-making to block premature closure.

Does end-to-end validation generate auditable records for acceptance criteria?

Yes, end-to-end validation generates auditable records by coordinating evidence collection and explicit approval decisions, ensuring acceptance criteria are met and creating clear next steps for feedback or remediation.

What are the limitations of manual approval gates for software validation?

Manual approval gates lack coordinated automated checks and evidence collection, risking premature closure; a formal validation gate coordinates both to enforce acceptance criteria and generate auditable records.

Can I use automated checks with human reviews for final task validation?

Yes, final task validation coordinates automated checks alongside human review gates, collecting evidence to ensure acceptance criteria are met before requiring explicit user approval to proceed.