ring:testing-anti-patterns

Detect testing anti-patterns like mock-only assertions in test suites.

Updated Mar 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LucasMalessa/TheRing --skill ring-testing-anti-patterns
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ring:testing-anti-patterns
Source: https://github.com/LucasMalessa/TheRing/tree/main/default/skills/testing-anti-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LucasMalessa/TheRing --skill ring-testing-anti-patterns

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams identify and prevent testing anti-patterns that pollute production code and degrade test reliability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Detects and flags common test anti-patterns such as mocking production behavior and testing mock existence rather than real behavior.
  • Guides safe refactoring by ensuring tests remain aligned with actual code behavior.
  • Use Case: When reviewing or modifying tests, or when adding mocks, to ensure production code is not polluted by test-only logic.

Quick Start

Audit your test suite to remove mock-only assertions and ensure tests verify real behavior.

Frequently Asked Questions about ring:testing-anti-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What are testing anti-patterns that pollute production code?

Testing anti-patterns include mocking production behavior, testing mock existence rather than real behavior, and adding test-only production methods that pollute the codebase and degrade test reliability.

How do I prevent test-only methods in production code?

To prevent test-only methods in production code, audit your test suite during code reviews to flag and forbid test-only production logic, ensuring mocks are complete and tests verify real behavior.

Why does testing mock behavior degrade test quality?

Testing mock behavior degrades test quality because it verifies the mock's existence rather than the actual code behavior, leading to false positives and misaligned tests during refactoring.

How do I audit test suites for mocking anti-patterns?

Audit test suites for mocking anti-patterns by reviewing tests and mocks to remove mock-only assertions, enforcing complete mocks, and ensuring all tests verify actual code behavior.

When should I refactor mocks to ensure clean production code?

Refactor mocks to ensure clean production code when modifying tests or introducing new mocks, enforcing rules against test-only production methods to keep test suites aligned with real behavior.