rlxp-define-metrics

Define task-scoped reinforcement-learning metrics, guardrails, and scorecards for a study.

1|Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/junhyekh/rlxp --skill rlxp-define-metrics
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rlxp-define-metrics
Source: https://github.com/junhyekh/rlxp/tree/main/plugins/rl-experiment-assistant/skills/rlxp-define-metrics
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/junhyekh/rlxp --skill rlxp-define-metrics

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps define clear, task-scoped reinforcement-learning metrics when training reward is not enough to judge success or compare experiments fairly.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Primary Metric Design: Establish the main outcome metric for a specific task and study.
  • Guardrails and Diagnostics: Add component metrics, worst-bin checks, lower-quantile checks, and failure-mode diagnostics.
  • Scorecard Readiness: Produce metric specs and notes that support candidate validation, monitoring, result audits, and accept or reject decisions.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill when a baseline exists but the team needs a defensible scorecard for evaluating RL improvements without changing the protocol mid-study.

Quick Start

Use this skill to define the primary metric, guardrails, and scorecard for the current RL task and study.

Frequently Asked Questions about rlxp-define-metrics

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I define reinforcement learning metrics beyond training reward?

To define reinforcement learning metrics beyond training reward, establish a primary outcome metric, add component guardrails, and create a scorecard for evaluating task progress and comparing experiments fairly.

What are guardrails and diagnostics in RL evaluation?

Guardrails and diagnostics in RL evaluation are component metrics, worst-bin checks, lower-quantile checks, and failure-mode tracking used to measure specific performance boundaries and identify issues beyond the primary training reward.

When do I need a scorecard for evaluating RL improvements?

You need a scorecard for evaluating RL improvements when success criteria are ambiguous, baseline metrics are incomplete, or you require normalized component and diagnostic measures to make defensible accept or reject decisions.

How do I ensure RL experiment comparisons remain fair and stable?

To ensure RL experiment comparisons remain fair and stable, maintain a stable evaluation protocol with metric provenance, evaluation outputs, and failure modes so metric specs, candidate validation, and result audits stay comparable.

Can I use this to evaluate one specific RL task and study?

Yes, this defines task-scoped reinforcement learning metrics, guardrails, and scorecards that apply to one specific task and one study to measure progress without changing the protocol mid-study.