roborev:address

Fetch a roborev review by job_id and implement its fixes.

1.6k|143|Updated Jan 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/roborev-dev/roborev --skill roborev-address
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: roborev:address
Source: https://github.com/roborev-dev/roborev/tree/main/internal/skills/codex/roborev-address
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/roborev-dev/roborev --skill roborev-address

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Address roborev code-review findings by fetching the review and implementing the necessary fixes to the codebase.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Retrieve a specific roborev job and inspect findings to determine actionable items.
  • Apply fixes to the codebase, run tests, and prepare a clear address workflow with audit trail.
  • Notify and document addressed findings to maintain traceability across reviews.

Quick Start

Fetch a roborev review by job_id and apply the fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about roborev:address

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automatically fix code review findings in git?

To automatically fix code review findings in git, you can use an automation tool to fetch the review, apply the recommended code changes, and validate the fixes with testing. This process applies the changes to the target repository and records the addressed status.

What is the best way to address code changes recommended by an automated code review?

The best way to address code changes from an automated review is to fetch the specific job, implement the recommended fixes, and run tests to validate the changes. If a finding cannot be addressed, the process skips changes and provides a clear explanation.

Can I run tests automatically after applying a bug fix to my codebase?

Yes, you can run tests automatically after applying a bug fix. The automation workflow applies the code changes to the target repository and then validates them by running tests to ensure the fixes are correct before recording the addressed status.

What happens if a code review finding cannot be fixed automatically?

If a code review finding cannot be fixed automatically, the process skips applying changes to the repository. It instead provides a clear explanation of why the review cannot be addressed, ensuring traceability without altering the codebase.

How do I track the status of automated bug fixes in my repository?

You can track the status of automated bug fixes by recording the addressed status after applying changes. The workflow documents addressed findings to maintain traceability across reviews, creating an audit trail of what was fixed and validated.