roborev:review

Review a specified commit and report structured findings by severity.

1.6k|143|Updated Jan 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/roborev-dev/roborev --skill roborev-review-roborev-dev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: roborev:review
Source: https://github.com/roborev-dev/roborev/tree/main/internal/skills/claude/roborev-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/roborev-dev/roborev --skill roborev-review-roborev-dev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Request a code review for a commit and present the results to users, automating the workflow to keep context fresh.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Background submission: Initiates a code review for a specified commit and returns results when complete.
  • Flexible scope: Accepts a specific commit or defaults to HEAD, with optional --type security|design to focus findings.
  • Structured results: Displays a verdict and findings grouped by severity, with navigation cues and guidance.

Quick Start

Invoke /roborev:review with an optional commit and an optional --type flag to start a background review and monitor the results until the verdict is reported.

Frequently Asked Questions about roborev:review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a code review for a specific git commit?

To automate a code review for a specific git commit, you can submit a background task that validates your input refs and executes a review on the given commit or HEAD. This process returns structured findings grouped by severity to guide issue resolution.

Can I run a security or design focused code review on my latest commit?

Yes, you can run a security or design focused code review by specifying an optional type flag when requesting the review. This focuses the automated background analysis on either security vulnerabilities or design flaws for your specified commit.

How does background code review work for commit-based workflows?

Background code review works by constructing a review command for a specific commit, executing it as a background task, and monitoring the process. It then reports the final verdict and structured findings without blocking your current development workflow.

What is the best way to view structured findings from an automated code review?

The best way to view structured findings from an automated code review is through the generated results report. This report displays a final verdict alongside findings grouped by severity, providing navigation cues and actionable guidance for addressing each issue.

Do I need to specify a commit hash to run an automated code review?

No, you do not need to specify a commit hash to run an automated code review. The review defaults to HEAD if no specific commit is provided, validating input refs automatically before executing the background task.