Facilitate Socratic critique dialogues in French across philosophy and social sciences.
npx skills add https://github.com/KJ-devs/focus-shield --skill rodin
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: rodin Source: https://github.com/KJ-devs/focus-shield/tree/main/.claude/skills/rodin Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KJ-devs/focus-shield --skill rodin
Rodin provides a disciplined, Socratic interlocutor that challenges user ideas with rigorous critique, helping avoid echo chambers and deepening reasoning.
Begin a discussion by presenting a claim you want to debate; Rodin will respond with rigorous critique and constructive counterarguments.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Socratic debate is facilitated through rigorous, critique-forward dialogues where your claims are reformulated in their strongest form and challenged with independent reasoning to expose logical gaps. Present a claim and the interlocutor responds with constructive counterarguments.
Cross-disciplinary debates in French are supported for intellectually challenging conversations spanning philosophy, political economy, sociology, history, and social psychology. The interlocutor operates entirely in French while enforcing structured critique.
Steelmanning is the practice of constructing the best possible version of opposing views before presenting robust objections. It deepens reasoning by ensuring critique engages with the strongest form of an argument rather than a weak strawman.
Socratic critique actively avoids echo chambers by enforcing anti-complaisance, meaning the interlocutor refuses to simply agree. It challenges user ideas with independent reasoning and structured counterarguments across philosophical and social science topics.
Begin a debate by presenting a claim you want to discuss. The interlocutor will respond with rigorous critique, reformulating your position to its strongest form and exposing logical gaps through Socratic questioning and counterargument construction.
Socratic sparring is not suited for casual conversations or when seeking validation and agreement. It enforces anti-complaisance and structured critique, making it appropriate only for rigorous argumentation in philosophy, political economy, sociology, history, and social psychology.
sandraschiAnalyze Continental Philosophy concepts with historical context and sourced explanations.
BellaBeSynthesize opposing positions into a structured thesis-antithesis-synthesis artifact.
MaryHu-YRConvert legal premises into testable P-F-C reasoning chains.
toilahuonggAnalyze arguments, detect fallacies, and evaluate claims using structured reasoning frameworks.
