roster-plan

Decompose validated project intake briefs into role-specific execution sub-briefs.

2|2|Updated Mar 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster --skill roster-plan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: roster-plan
Source: https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster/tree/main/.opencode/skills/roster-plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster --skill roster-plan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the error-prone, inconsistent manual work of breaking down validated project intake briefs into structured, role-specific sub-briefs for coordinated AI agent teams, ensuring every pipeline participant works from aligned, complete instructions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Dual-Voice Analysis: Spawns two independent analysis passes to catch unverified assumptions, hidden risks, and edge cases missed in the original brief.
  • Automated Sub-Brief Generation: Produces ready-to-use implementer, reviewer, and QA sub-briefs with aligned quality gates, scope boundaries, and risk assessments.
  • Built-In Human Validation: Includes a structured comprehension, clarification, and consistency-check quiz to catch plan flaws before execution begins.
  • Use Case: A software team using the Roster pipeline can use this Skill to turn a validated intake brief for a new payment processing feature into clear, role-specific instructions for their implementer, reviewer, and QA agents, reducing rework and misalignment.

Quick Start

Use the roster-plan skill to decompose your validated intake brief for the new user authentication feature into aligned sub-briefs for your agent pipeline.

Frequently Asked Questions about roster-plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I decompose a validated project brief into sub-briefs for AI agent pipelines?

Brief decomposition for AI agent pipelines is automated by generating role-specific implementer, reviewer, and QA sub-briefs with aligned quality gates and risk assessments from validated intake briefs.

What is adversarial dual-voice analysis for software development pipeline planning?

Adversarial dual-voice analysis for pipeline planning spawns two independent analysis passes to catch unverified assumptions, hidden risks, and edge cases missed in the original project brief.

How do I add human validation gating to an AI agent orchestration workflow?

Human validation gating is added through a structured comprehension, clarification, and consistency-check quiz that catches pipeline plan flaws and unverified assumptions before execution begins.

Can I use roster-plan to generate sub-briefs outside the Roster pipeline framework?

The Skill is specifically designed for software development workflows using the Roster pipeline framework, applying adversarial analysis and structured artifact generation to ensure pipeline plans are complete and low-risk.

What's the best way to ensure QA and implementer agents work from aligned instructions?

Producing ready-to-use implementer, reviewer, and QA sub-briefs with aligned quality gates and scope boundaries ensures every pipeline participant works from complete, coordinated instructions that match original brief requirements.