roundtable

Simulate structured debates between real-world figures to uncover conceptual tensions.

16|1|Updated Jan 2, 2026

Search Tags:#philosophy #org-mode #debate #multi-perspective #roundtable #knowledge-network

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/bahayonghang/my-ai-cli-toolkit --skill roundtable-bahayonghang

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: roundtable
Source: https://github.com/bahayonghang/my-ai-cli-toolkit/tree/main/skills/research-learning-knowledge/roundtable
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bahayonghang/my-ai-cli-toolkit --skill roundtable-bahayonghang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the problem of shallow, one-sided AI responses by organizing structured, multi-perspective debates that force deep exploration of complex topics through the lens of representative historical or contemporary figures.

Core Features & Use Cases

Multi-Perspective Debate: Simulates a roundtable discussion between 3-4 real figures to expose the deepest fault lines in an argument.
Structured Moderation: Uses ASCII framework diagrams and moderator synthesis to ensure the discussion remains focused and logical.
Use Case: Use this when you need to move beyond simple pros/cons lists to understand the underlying structural tensions of a philosophical or technical debate.

Quick Start

Invoke the roundtable skill by asking the AI to conduct a roundtable discussion on the impact of artificial intelligence on human creativity.

Frequently Asked Questions about roundtable

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a multi-perspective debate to analyze complex philosophical tensions?▼

A multi-perspective debate simulates a roundtable discussion between 3-4 representative real-world figures to expose core conceptual tensions. It uses structured moderation and ASCII knowledge network visualization to ensure factual, non-performative discourse.

What is the best way to move beyond simple pros and cons lists for strategic analysis?▼

Moving beyond pros and cons lists requires simulating a roundtable discussion between real figures to uncover deep structural tensions. This approach replaces shallow analysis with factual, moderated debate and ASCII knowledge network visualization.

How does ASCII visualization help map a knowledge network during a debate?▼

ASCII visualization maps a knowledge network by rendering structured framework diagrams during multi-perspective debates. This ensures discussion remains focused and logical, visually tracking conceptual tensions as they emerge between representative figures.

Can I use this multi-perspective debate approach for complex research and philosophical inquiry?▼

Yes, this multi-perspective debate approach is specifically designed for complex research and philosophical inquiry. It simulates debates between representative real-world figures to uncover core conceptual tensions and deep structural understanding.

When should I not use a simulated roundtable discussion for my analysis?▼

You should not use a simulated roundtable discussion when your analysis only requires simple factual answers or shallow overviews. This approach demands strict adherence to factual, non-performative discourse and disciplined moderation to uncover deep structural understanding.