rrwrite-research-literature

Automated literature review generation extracts topics from PROJECT.md, searches foundational and recent literature, then outputs a citation-backed summary, BibTeX file, and evidence CSV with extracted DOIs and quotes for manuscript integration.

Yes, generating a BibTeX file and evidence CSV from a research topic involves searching literature, extracting DOIs and quotes, and outputting literature_citations.bib and literature_evidence.csv alongside a structured literature.md summary for verification.

Structuring a related work summary using extracted DOIs involves synthesizing background, competing methods, and research gaps into a one-page literature.md, supported by a bib additions file and evidence CSV for manuscript workflow integration.

Yes, literature review automation infers research topics by reading PROJECT.md, manuscript_plan.md, and existing manuscript sections, using this context to target foundational reviews and recent advances during the systematic literature search.

Verifying extracted evidence quotes after systematic literature search uses the generated literature_evidence.csv file, which maps extracted DOIs and direct quotes to their sources, enabling verification before integration into the manuscript workflow.

Limitations when generating citation-rich summaries from topic extraction include reliance on the accuracy of PROJECT.md and manuscript plan documents for topic inference, and the need to manually verify extracted DOIs and quotes within the evidence CSV.