rt-gurley

Stress-test marketplace liquidity, take rate, disintermediation risk, and unit economics under scale.

28|11|Updated Apr 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/risingdream/roundtable --skill rt-gurley
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rt-gurley
Source: https://github.com/risingdream/roundtable/tree/main/skills/vc/rt-gurley
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/risingdream/roundtable --skill rt-gurley

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you evaluate whether a marketplace business model is economically viable, defensible, and investable by stress-testing take rates, liquidity moats, and unit economics under scale.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Marketplace economics diagnosis: Assesses liquidity as the real moat, whether unit economics improve with scale, and how disintermediation risk changes incentives.
  • Good vs bad revenue review: Separates recurring, high-quality revenue from subsidized, promotional, or incentive-driven revenue that won’t survive.
  • Late-stage valuation critique: Benchmarks late private valuations against public-market reality and identifies when pricing is detached from fundamentals.

Quick Start

Ask for a marketplace economics teardown by saying: “Analyze this business as a marketplace—what are the take rate, liquidity moat, disintermediation risk, and unit economics, and should we invest or pass?”

Frequently Asked Questions about rt-gurley

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test marketplace unit economics for investment readiness?

To stress-test marketplace unit economics, evaluate whether liquidity acts as a true moat, assess if take rates hold under scale, and identify if disintermediation risk threatens revenue quality. This process separates subsidized revenue from defensible, high-quality income to determine actual investment viability.

What is the difference between good vs bad revenue in a two-sided marketplace?

Good revenue in a marketplace is recurring and high-quality, surviving without promotional subsidies. Bad revenue is incentive-driven or promotional, artificially inflating take rates and unit economics without establishing a sustainable liquidity moat or long-term defensible growth.

How do I evaluate late-stage venture valuation for a marketplace business?

Evaluate late-stage venture valuation by benchmarking private marketplace pricing against public-market reality. This critique identifies when aggressive valuations are detached from underlying unit economics, liquidity defensibility, and actual sustainable take rate fundamentals.

Does marketplace liquidity protect against disintermediation risk at scale?

Marketplace liquidity can protect against disintermediation risk if it strengthens user incentives to stay on-platform. Stress-testing unit economics under scale reveals whether the liquidity moat is defensible or if users will bypass the platform once promotional subsidies end.

When should an investor pass on a marketplace deal with aggressive valuation?

Investors should pass when late-stage marketplace valuations detach from public-market fundamentals, and unit economics rely on bad revenue. If stress-testing reveals weak take rates, poor liquidity moats, and high disintermediation risk, the investment lacks defensibility.